Independent site, not affiliated with the journal Reproduction, its publishers or the Society for Reproduction and Fertility. About this site

Home › Research topics

Research topic

Fertilization in mammals

Fertilization is a chain of steps, each of which must succeed for a single sperm and a single egg to start a new embryo. Several of those steps were only explained in the last twenty years.

By the reproduction-online.org editorial team · Published 28 October 2026 · 4 min read

Fertilization is the meeting and fusion of a sperm and an egg. In mammals it takes place inside the female body, in the ampulla, the widest part of the oviduct (the fallopian tube in humans). It is not a single event but a sequence: sperm must become competent to fertilize, pass through the layers that surround the egg, recognise and fuse with the egg membrane, activate the egg, and make sure that no second sperm gets in.

The journals behind this archive followed each of these steps across many species, from cattle, sheep, pigs and buffalo to laboratory rodents, often in the context of in vitro fertilization. The sections below trace what is now known and where the gaps remain.

Getting ready: the female tract and capacitation

Freshly ejaculated sperm cannot fertilize straight away. They first undergo capacitation, a change that makes them capable of fertilizing an egg still enclosed in its coat. In the body this takes place in the female tract and lasts hours. Sperm stored in the lower part of the oviduct, the isthmus, are thought to be released a few at a time towards the ampulla. Despite decades of work, the molecular basis of capacitation is still not fully understood: one long-accepted marker, a particular pattern of protein phosphorylation, turned out not to be essential in some experiments.

Crossing the egg’s coats

The mammalian egg is surrounded by two barriers. The outer one is the cumulus, a cloud of cells held in a sticky matrix. The inner one is the zona pellucida, a thick coat of glycoproteins. To reach the egg, sperm must pass through both, and to cross the zona they need the acrosome reaction, the release of the enzyme-filled cap on the sperm head.

For many years the standard view was that contact with the zona triggered the acrosome reaction. Experiments published in 2011, using mouse sperm engineered to make the reaction visible under the microscope, found that most of the sperm that went on to fertilize cumulus-enclosed eggs had begun the reaction before reaching the zona. Ryuzo Yanagimachi, who has studied mammalian fertilization for more than 60 years, noted in a 2022 review that there is still no general agreement on the time, site and cause of the acrosome reaction in the body. Why the cumulus helps fertilization, and how exactly sperm pass through the zona, are listed among the field’s unsolved questions.

These findings matter partly because so much of the classic work on fertilization was done in the laboratory dish, often with the cumulus removed to make sperm–zona interactions easier to observe. Results obtained under such conditions do not always match what happens in the oviduct, and researchers now pay closer attention to the environment in which fertilization naturally takes place.

Recognition and fusion: Izumo1 and Juno

The molecules that let sperm and egg recognise each other were identified only recently. In 2005 researchers in Japan described Izumo, a protein on the sperm surface. Male mice lacking it were healthy but sterile: their sperm could penetrate the zona pellucida but could not fuse with the egg. Human sperm carry the same protein.

The partner on the egg remained unknown until 2014, when a team in the United Kingdom showed that a protein previously classified as folate receptor 4 binds Izumo1. They renamed it Juno. Female mice without Juno are infertile, and the Izumo1–Juno interaction is conserved in several mammals, including humans. Neither protein appears to cause membrane fusion directly; both behave as adhesion molecules, so the actual fusion machinery is still being sought.

Waking the egg: calcium and PLCζ

Once the sperm has fused, the egg is activated by a series of repeated rises in calcium inside the cell. These calcium oscillations are essential for further development. A long-standing hypothesis held that the sperm delivers a soluble “sperm factor” that sets them off. In 2002 researchers identified a sperm-specific enzyme, phospholipase C zeta (PLCζ), that triggers calcium oscillations in mouse eggs indistinguishable from those seen at fertilization. The amount present in a single sperm was enough to support development to the blastocyst stage. PLCζ is the best-studied candidate for the sperm’s activating signal, but other molecules have been proposed and the question is not considered fully closed.

One sperm only: blocks to polyspermy

Fertilization by more than one sperm, called polyspermy, is a danger the egg must guard against. Mammalian eggs have two defences:

  • the zona reaction, in which granules just below the egg surface release enzymes that partly break down zona proteins, so that further sperm can no longer bind or pass;
  • a membrane block at the egg surface. The rapid shedding of Juno from the egg membrane after fertilization has been suggested as one way this block works.

From the laboratory to the clinic

Knowledge of fertilization underpins assisted reproduction, described on the page on IVF and assisted reproduction. In intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), an embryologist injects a single sperm directly into the egg, bypassing capacitation, the egg coats and membrane fusion. The UK fertility regulator, the HFEA, describes ICSI as the most common and successful treatment for male infertility. It also states that there is currently no scientific evidence to support using ICSI when infertility is not related to sperm, and that ICSI carries slightly more risks than some other fertility treatments.

What is settled and what is not

The overall sequence of mammalian fertilization is well established, as are the roles of Izumo1 and Juno in sperm–egg binding and of calcium oscillations in egg activation. Open questions include the exact timing and trigger of the acrosome reaction in the body, how sperm penetrate the zona, which molecules actually fuse the two membranes, and the full set of factors the sperm uses to activate the egg. This page summarises peer-reviewed research and regulator information and is not medical advice.

Sources

  1. Yanagimachi R, Biology of Reproduction, 2022 — Mysteries and unsolved problems of mammalian fertilization and related topics (doi:10.1093/biolre/ioac037)
  2. Jin M et al., PNAS, 2011 — Most fertilizing mouse spermatozoa begin their acrosome reaction before contact with the zona pellucida during in vitro fertilization (doi:10.1073/pnas.1018202108)
  3. Inoue N, Ikawa M, Isotani A, Okabe M, Nature, 2005 — The immunoglobulin superfamily protein Izumo is required for sperm to fuse with eggs (doi:10.1038/nature03362)
  4. Bianchi E, Doe B, Goulding D, Wright GJ, Nature, 2014 — Juno is the egg Izumo receptor and is essential for mammalian fertilization (doi:10.1038/nature13203)
  5. Saunders CM et al., Development, 2002 — PLC zeta: a sperm-specific trigger of Ca2+ oscillations in eggs and embryo development (doi:10.1242/dev.129.15.3533)
  6. HFEA, “Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)”

References from the journal archive

These articles were published in Reproduction, the Journal of Reproduction and Fertility or Reviews of Reproduction and are still cited at their old addresses on this domain. Each link leads to the publisher’s version through its DOI.

  1. MATURATION, TRANSPLANTATION AND FERTILIZATION OF OVARIAN OOCYTES IN CATTLE Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 1972 · DOI 10.1530/jrf.0.0300325
  2. THE REQUIREMENT OF A TRYPSIN-LIKE ACROSOMAL ENZYME FOR FERTILIZATION IN THE DOMESTIC FOWL Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 1973 · DOI 10.1530/jrf.0.0350007
  3. Fertilization in vitro and development to term of unfertilized mouse oocytes previously stored at —196°C Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 1977 · DOI 10.1530/jrf.0.0490089
  4. Effects of epinephrine and hypotaurine on in-vitro fertilization in the golden hamster Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 1982 · DOI 10.1530/jrf.0.0660087
  5. Effects of sera, hormones and granulosa cells added to culture medium for in-vitro maturation, fertilization, cleavage and development of bovine oocytes Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 1989 · DOI 10.1530/jrf.0.0860501
  6. Oocyte recovery, maturation and fertilization in vitro in the puma ( Felis concolor ) Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 1990 · DOI 10.1530/jrf.0.0880249
  7. In vitro maturation, fertilization and development of follicular oocytes from buffalo ( Bubalus bubalis ) Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 1992 · DOI 10.1530/jrf.0.0950597
  8. Developmental competence of goat oocytes from follicles of different size categories following maturation, fertilization and culture in vitro Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 1995 · DOI 10.1530/jrf.0.1030293
  9. Inhibition of bovine fertilization in vitro by antibodies to SP-10 Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 1996 · DOI 10.1530/jrf.0.1070287
  10. Three-dimensional structure of the zona pellucida Reviews of Reproduction, 1997 · DOI 10.1530/ror.0.0020147
  11. Early ionic events in activation of the mammalian egg Reviews of Reproduction, 1998 · DOI 10.1530/ror.0.0030096
  12. Effect of ornidazole on fertility of male rats: inhibition of a glycolysis-related motility pattern and zona binding required for fertilization in vitro Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 2000 · DOI 10.1530/reprod/118.1.127
  13. Fatty acid composition of lipids in immature cattle, pig and sheep oocytes with intact zona pellucida Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 2000 · DOI 10.1530/reprod/118.1.163
  14. The zona pellucida: using molecular genetics to study the mammalian egg coat Reviews of Reproduction, 2000 · DOI 10.1530/ror.0.0050114
  15. Effect of in vitrofertilization medium on the acrosome reaction, cortical reaction, zona pellucida hardening and in vitro development in pigs Reproduction, 2002 · DOI 10.1530/rep.0.1240279
  16. Immunohistochemical localization of inhibin/activin alpha, βA and βB subunits and follistatin in bovine oocytes during in vitro maturation and fertilization Reproduction, 2003 · DOI 10.1530/rep.0.1250033
  17. In vivo meiotic resumption, fertilization and early embryonic development in the bitch Reproduction, 2005 · DOI 10.1530/rep.1.00500
  18. Phospholipase Cζ, the trigger of egg activation in mammals, is present in a non-mammalian species Reproduction, 2005 · DOI 10.1530/rep.1.00707
  19. Body composition, dietary carbohydrates and fatty acids determine post-fertilisation development of bovine oocytes in vitro Reproduction, 2006 · DOI 10.1530/rep.1.00871
  20. Regulation of dynamic events by microfilaments during oocyte maturation and fertilization Reproduction, 2006 · DOI 10.1530/rep.1.00847
  21. Release of phospholipase C ζand [Ca2+]i oscillation-inducing activity during mammalian fertilization Reproduction, 2007 · DOI 10.1530/rep-07-0259
  22. Expression of genes involved in prostaglandin E2 and progesterone production in bovine cumulus–oocyte complexes during in vitro maturation and fertilization Reproduction, 2008 · DOI 10.1530/rep-07-0453
  23. Progesterone receptor membrane component 1 expression and putative function in bovine oocyte maturation, fertilization, and early embryonic development Reproduction, 2010 · DOI 10.1530/rep-10-0218
  24. Evaluation of bovine zona pellucida characteristics in polarized light as a prognostic marker for embryonic developmental potential Reproduction, 2011 · DOI 10.1530/rep-10-0471
  25. New insights into the role of centrosomes in mammalian fertilization and implications for ART Reproduction, 2011 · DOI 10.1530/rep-11-0261
  26. Calcium influx in mammalian eggs Reproduction, 2013 · DOI 10.1530/rep-12-0496
  27. Role of ghrelin in fertilization, early embryo development, and implantation periods Reproduction, 2014 · DOI 10.1530/rep-14-0129
  28. [Mg2+]o/[Ca2+]o determines Ca2+ response at fertilization: tuning of adult phenotype? Reproduction, 2017 · DOI 10.1530/rep-16-0057